2020 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2020 Jaguar F-Pace

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash

Safety

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

For enhanced safety, the front and middle seat shoulder belts of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Jaguar F-Pace doesn’t offer pretensioners for the middle seat belts.

The Range Rover Sport’s optional pre-crash front seatbelts will tighten automatically in the event the vehicle detects an impending crash, improving protection against injury significantly. The F-Pace doesn’t offer pre-crash pretensioners.

For enhanced safety, the front seat shoulder belts of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Jaguar F-Pace doesn’t offer height-adjustable seat belts.

Compared to metal, the Range Rover Sport’s plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Jaguar F-Pace has a metal gas tank.

Both the Range Rover Sport and the F-Pace have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, four-wheel antilock brakes, all-wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, around view monitors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

Engine

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport has more powerful engines than the F-Pace:

Horsepower

Torque

Range Rover Sport P360 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid

355 HP

365 lbs.-ft.

Range Rover Sport P400 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid

395 HP

406 lbs.-ft.

Range Rover Sport P400e 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. hybrid

398 HP

472 lbs.-ft.

Range Rover Sport 5.0 supercharged V8

518 HP

461 lbs.-ft.

Range Rover Sport SVR 5.0 supercharged V8

575 HP

516 lbs.-ft.

F-Pace 25t 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

247 HP

269 lbs.-ft.

F-Pace 30t 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

296 HP

295 lbs.-ft.

F-Pace S 3.0 supercharged V6

380 HP

332 lbs.-ft.

F-Pace SVR 5.0 supercharged V8

550 HP

502 lbs.-ft.

The Range Rover Sport’s 3.0 turbo V6 diesel produces 7 more horsepower (254 vs. 247) and 174 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 269) than the F-Pace 25t’s standard 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Range Rover Sport’s 3.0 turbo V6 diesel produces 148 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 295) than the F-Pace 30t’s standard 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. The Range Rover Sport’s 3.0 turbo V6 diesel produces 111 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 332) than the F-Pace S’ standard 3.0 supercharged V6.

As tested in Car and Driver the Range Rover Sport SVR 5.0 supercharged V8 is faster than the Jaguar F-Pace:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace 30t

F-Pace S

Zero to 60 MPH

4.3 sec

6.2 sec

5.3 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

10.5 sec

16.3 sec

13.2 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

4.8 sec

7.1 sec

5.7 sec

Quarter Mile

12.8 sec

14.7 sec

13.9 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

111 MPH

95 MPH

102 MPH

As tested in Car and Driver the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is faster than the F-Pace 30t 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace

Zero to 60 MPH

4.6 sec

6.2 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

11 sec

16.3 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

4.9 sec

7.1 sec

Quarter Mile

13.1 sec

14.7 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

109 MPH

95 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

On the EPA test cycle the Range Rover Sport Td6 gets better highway fuel mileage than the F-Pace 25t (22 city/28 hwy vs. 22 city/27 hwy).

The Range Rover Sport P400e can drive on battery power alone for up to 31 miles. The F-Pace must run its internal combustion engine to move.

The Range Rover Sport Diesel’s standard fuel tank has a gallon more fuel capacity than the F-Pace (22.7 vs. 21.7 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups. The Range Rover Sport’s standard fuel tank has 5.9 gallons more fuel capacity than the F-Pace (27.6 vs. 21.7 gallons).

Brakes and Stopping

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

For better stopping power the Range Rover Sport’s standard brake rotors are larger than those on the F-Pace:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace

Front Rotors

13.7 inches

12.8 inches

The Range Rover Sport stops much shorter than the F-Pace:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace

60 to 0 MPH

106 feet

121 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

For better traction, the Range Rover Sport’s optional tires are larger than the largest tires available on the F-Pace (275/40R22 vs. 265/45R21).

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Range Rover Sport has standard 19-inch wheels. Smaller 18-inch wheels are standard on the F-Pace Base. The Range Rover Sport’s optional 22-inch wheels are larger than the 21-inch wheels on the F-Pace SVR.

Suspension and Handling

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport V8 has active sway bars, which help keep it flat and controlled during cornering, but disconnect at lower speeds to smooth the ride and offer greater off-road suspension articulation. This helps keep the tires glued to the road on-road and off. The F-Pace doesn’t offer an active sway bar system.

The front and rear suspension of the Range Rover Sport uses air springs for a smoother, controlled ride than the F-Pace, which uses coil springs. Air springs maintain proper ride height and ride more smoothly.

The Range Rover Sport has a standard automatic front and rear load leveling suspension to keep ride height level with a heavy load or when towing. The Range Rover Sport’s height leveling suspension allows the driver to raise ride height for better off-road clearance and then lower it again for easier entering and exiting and better on-road handling. The F-Pace doesn’t offer a load leveling suspension.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Range Rover Sport’s wheelbase is 2 inches longer than on the F-Pace (115.1 inches vs. 113.1 inches).

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the Range Rover Sport is 2 inches wider in the front and 1 inch wider in the rear than the average track on the F-Pace.

The Range Rover Sport SVR handles at .87 G’s, while the F-Pace Portfolio pulls only .85 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Range Rover Sport SVR executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.6 seconds quicker than the F-Pace R-Sport (25.2 seconds @ .77 average G’s vs. 26.8 seconds @ .67 average G’s).

For greater off-road capability the Range Rover Sport SVR has a 4.9 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the F-Pace SVR (10.8 vs. 5.9 inches), allowing the Range Rover Sport to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The Range Rover Sport’s minimum ground clearance is 4.6 inches higher than on the F-Pace (10.9 vs. 6.3 inches).

Chassis

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

As tested by Car and Driver, the interior of the Range Rover Sport HSE is quieter than the F-Pace S:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace

Full-Throttle

70 dB

81 dB

70 MPH Cruising

65 dB

69 dB

Passenger Space

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport offers optional seating for 7 passengers; the F-Pace can only carry 5.

The Range Rover Sport has 32 cubic feet more passenger volume than the F-Pace (128 vs. 96).

The Range Rover Sport has .9 inches more front headroom, 3 inches more front shoulder room, 1.5 inches more rear headroom and 3.7 inches more rear shoulder room than the F-Pace.

Cargo Capacity

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport’s cargo area is larger than the F-Pace’s in every dimension:

Range Rover Sport

F-Pace

Length to seat (2nd/1st)

41.3”/73.5”

40.6”/71.9”

Max Width

50.6”

49.4”

Min Width

44”

40.7”

Height

31.1”

29.6”

Payload and Towing

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the F-Pace’s (7716 vs. 5290 pounds).

The Range Rover Sport has a higher standard payload capacity than the F-Pace (1631 vs. 1510 lbs.).

Ergonomics

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

Unlike the driver-only memory system in the F-Pace (except Base), the Range Rover Sport has standard driver and passenger memory, so that when drivers switch, the memory setting adjusts the driver’s seat, steering wheel position and outside mirror angle and the front passenger seat also adjusts to the new passenger’s preset preferences.

Optional air-conditioned the front and second row seats keep the Range Rover Sport’s passengers comfortable and take the sting out of hot leather in summer. The F-Pace doesn’t offer air-conditioned seats in the rear.

The Range Rover Sport offers an optional 115-volt a/c outlet on the center console, allowing you to recharge a laptop or run small household appliances without special adapters that can break or get misplaced. The F-Pace doesn’t offer a house-current electrical outlet.

Recommendations

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/11/20

The Range Rover Sport was selected by Petersen's 4-Wheel & Off-Road magazine as their 2014 4x4 of the Year. The F-Pace has never been chosen.

The Land Rover Range Rover Sport outsold the Jaguar F-Pace by 65% during the 2019 model year.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos