2020 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs. 2020 Land Rover Range Rover

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash

2020 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Available Now!

Land Rover Range Rover image 0Land Rover Range Rover image 1Land Rover Range Rover image 2Land Rover Range Rover image 3Land Rover Range Rover image 4Land Rover Range Rover image 5Land Rover Range Rover image 6Land Rover Range Rover image 7Land Rover Range Rover image 8Land Rover Range Rover image 9

2020 Land Rover Range Rover

Available Now!

Safety

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

Both the Stelvio Quadrifoglio and the Range Rover have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all-wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available lane departure warning systems and driver alert monitors.

Reliability

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2019 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Alfa Romeo vehicles are better in initial quality than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Alfa Romeo 29th in initial quality. With 12 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 32nd.

Engine

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 150 more horsepower (505 vs. 355) and 78 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 365) than the Range Rover P360’s standard 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 110 more horsepower (505 vs. 395) and 37 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 406) than the Range Rover P400’s standard 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 107 more horsepower (505 vs. 398) than the Range Rover P400e’s standard 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. hybrid.

As tested in Car and Driver the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio is faster than the Land Rover Range Rover:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover P525

Range Rover SVAutobiography

Zero to 30 MPH

1.3 sec

1.8 sec

2 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

3.3 sec

4.7 sec

5.2 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

8.4 sec

11.1 sec

12.7 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

4.3 sec

5.2 sec

5.8 sec

Passing 30 to 50 MPH

2.4 sec

2.5 sec

2.5 sec

Passing 50 to 70 MPH

2.6 sec

3.4 sec

3.3 sec

Quarter Mile

11.8 sec

13.1 sec

13.8 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

117 MPH

108 MPH

104 MPH

Top Speed

176 MPH

136 MPH

136 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

On the EPA test cycle the Stelvio Quadrifoglio gets better fuel mileage than the Range Rover P525 5.0 supercharged V8 (518 HP) (17 city/23 hwy vs. 16 city/21 hwy).

An engine control system that can shut down half of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s fuel efficiency. The Range Rover doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Brakes and Stopping

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

For better stopping power the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Range Rover:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover Td6

Range Rover Gas

Front Rotors

14.2 inches

15.4 inches

13.7 inches

15 inches

Rear Rotors

13.8 inches

14.2 inches

12.8 inches

14.4 inches

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio offers optional heat-treated ceramic brake rotors, which last ten to twenty times as long as conventional cast iron rotors, don’t rust, don’t fade during repeated high speed braking, and their lighter weight contribute to better braking, handling and acceleration. The Range Rover doesn’t offer ceramic brake rotors.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio stops much shorter than the Range Rover:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover

70 to 0 MPH

155 feet

188 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

103 feet

118 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

For better traction, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has larger tires than the Range Rover (F:255/45R20 & R:285/40R20 vs. 235/65R19).

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 255/45R20 front and 285/40R20 rear tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series front and 40 series rear profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Range Rover’s standard 65 series tires.

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard 20-inch wheels. Smaller 19-inch wheels are standard on the Range Rover.

Suspension and Handling

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio handles at .95 G’s, while the Range Rover P525 HSE pulls only .75 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 3.1 seconds quicker than the Range Rover HSE (24.6 seconds @ .79 average G’s vs. 27.7 seconds @ .67 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s turning circle is .8 feet tighter than the Range Rover’s (39.7 feet vs. 40.5 feet). The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s turning circle is 3.2 feet tighter than the Range Rover LWB’s (39.7 feet vs. 42.9 feet).

Chassis

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 650 to 1400 pounds less than the Land Rover Range Rover.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio is 11.8 inches shorter than the Range Rover, making the Stelvio Quadrifoglio easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio is 7.2 inches shorter in height than the Range Rover, making the Stelvio Quadrifoglio much easier to wash and garage and drive (lower center of gravity).

The design of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio amounts to more than styling. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has an aerodynamic coefficient of drag of .34 Cd. That is lower than the Range Rover (.34 to .35). A more efficient exterior helps keep the interior quieter and helps the Stelvio Quadrifoglio get better fuel mileage.

As tested by Car and Driver while cruising at 70 MPH, the interior of the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is quieter than the Range Rover P525 HSE (66 vs. 67 dB).

Cargo Capacity

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s liftgate lifts up in one piece, completely out of the way of loading and unloading, while sheltering the cargo loading area. The Range Rover’s tailgate’s top part raises up, but the bottom part lowers, getting in the way of loading and making an uneven surface for sliding cargo.

Ergonomics

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s power window, power lock, power mirror and cruise control switches are lit from behind, making them plainly visible and easier to operate at night. The Range Rover’s power mirror switches are unlit, making them difficult to find at night and operate safely.

Heated windshield washer nozzles are standard on the Stelvio Quadrifoglio to prevent washer fluid and nozzles from freezing and help continue to keep the windshield clear in sub-freezing temperatures. The Range Rover doesn’t offer heated windshield washer nozzles.

To help drivers see further while navigating curves, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle. The Range Rover doesn’t offer cornering lights.

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard extendable sun visors. The Range Rover doesn’t offer extendable visors.

To quickly and conveniently keep personal devices charged without cables tangling and wearing out, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio offers an optional wireless phone charging system (Qi) in the center console. The Range Rover doesn’t offer wireless personal charging.

Economic Advantages

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/01/24

IntelliChoice estimates that five-year ownership costs (depreciation, financing, insurance, fuel, fees, repairs and maintenance) for the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio will be $10129 to $116741 less than for the Land Rover Range Rover.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos