2020 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs. 2020 Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash

2020 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Available Now!

Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 0Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 1Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 2Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 3Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 4Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 5Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 6Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 7Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 8Land Rover Range Rover Sport image 9

2020 Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Available Now!

Safety

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

Both the Stelvio Quadrifoglio and the Range Rover Sport have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, all-wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available lane departure warning systems and driver alert monitors.

Reliability

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2019 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Alfa Romeo vehicles are better in initial quality than Land Rover vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Alfa Romeo 29th in initial quality. With 12 more problems per 100 vehicles, Land Rover is ranked 32nd.

Engine

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 150 more horsepower (505 vs. 355) and 78 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 365) than the Range Rover Sport P360’s standard 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 110 more horsepower (505 vs. 395) and 37 lbs.-ft. more torque (443 vs. 406) than the Range Rover Sport P400’s standard 3.0 DOHC 6 cyl. hybrid. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 107 more horsepower (505 vs. 398) than the Range Rover Sport P400e’s standard 2.0 turbo 4 cyl. hybrid.

As tested in Car and Driver the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio is faster than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover Sport

Range Rover Sport SVR

Zero to 60 MPH

3.3 sec

4.6 sec

4.3 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

8.4 sec

11 sec

10.5 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

4.3 sec

4.9 sec

4.8 sec

Quarter Mile

11.8 sec

13.1 sec

12.8 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

117 MPH

109 MPH

111 MPH

Top Speed

176 MPH

133 MPH

144 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

On the EPA test cycle the Stelvio Quadrifoglio gets better fuel mileage than the Range Rover Sport 5.0 supercharged V8 (518 HP) (17 city/23 hwy vs. 17 city/22 hwy).

An engine control system that can shut down half of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s fuel efficiency. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Brakes and Stopping

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

For better stopping power the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Range Rover Sport:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover Sport Td6

Range Rover Sport P400/400e/V8

Front Rotors

14.2 inches

15.4 inches

13.7 inches

15 inches

Rear Rotors

13.8 inches

14.2 inches

12.8 inches

14.4 inches

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio offers optional heat-treated ceramic brake rotors, which last ten to twenty times as long as conventional cast iron rotors, don’t rust, don’t fade during repeated high speed braking, and their lighter weight contribute to better braking, handling and acceleration. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer ceramic brake rotors.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio stops much shorter than the Range Rover Sport:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Range Rover Sport

70 to 0 MPH

155 feet

179 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

103 feet

125 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

For better traction, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has larger tires than the Range Rover Sport (F:255/45R20 & R:285/40R20 vs. 235/65R19).

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 255/45R20 front and 285/40R20 rear tires provide better handling because they have a lower 45 series front and 40 series rear profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Range Rover Sport’s standard 65 series tires.

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard 20-inch wheels. Smaller 19-inch wheels are standard on the Range Rover Sport.

Suspension and Handling

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio handles at .95 G’s, while the Range Rover Sport HSE pulls only .78 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 3 seconds quicker than the Range Rover Sport HSE (24.6 seconds @ .79 average G’s vs. 27.6 seconds @ .62 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s turning circle is .9 feet tighter than the Range Rover Sport’s (39.7 feet vs. 40.6 feet). The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s turning circle is 1 foot tighter than the Range Rover Sport SVR’s (39.7 feet vs. 40.7 feet).

Chassis

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 450 to 1100 pounds less than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio is 7 inches shorter than the Range Rover Sport, making the Stelvio Quadrifoglio easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

The design of the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio amounts to more than styling. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has an aerodynamic coefficient of drag of .34 Cd. That is lower than the Range Rover Sport (.34 to .35). A more efficient exterior helps keep the interior quieter and helps the Stelvio Quadrifoglio get better fuel mileage.

Cargo Capacity

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has a much larger cargo volume than the Range Rover Sport with its rear seat up (18.5 vs. 7.8 cubic feet).

Ergonomics

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

Heated windshield washer nozzles are standard on the Stelvio Quadrifoglio to prevent washer fluid and nozzles from freezing and help continue to keep the windshield clear in sub-freezing temperatures. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer heated windshield washer nozzles.

To help drivers see further while navigating curves, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer cornering lights.

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard extendable sun visors. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer extendable visors.

To quickly and conveniently keep personal devices charged without cables tangling and wearing out, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio offers an optional wireless phone charging system (Qi) in the center console. The Range Rover Sport doesn’t offer wireless personal charging.

Recommendations

© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2020/07/14

Motor Trend performed a comparison test in its October 2018 issue and they ranked the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio first. They ranked the Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR fourth.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos