2019 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2019 Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash


The Land Cruiser’s pre-crash front seatbelts will tighten automatically in the event the vehicle detects an impending crash, improving protection against injury significantly. The Cullinan doesn’t offer pre-crash pretensioners.

Both the Land Cruiser and the Cullinan have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.


Toyota’s powertrain warranty covers the Land Cruiser 1 year longer than Rolls-Royce covers the Cullinan. Any repair needed on the engine, transmission, axles, joints or driveshafts is fully covered for 5 years or 60,000 miles. Coverage on the Cullinan ends after only 4 years.

The Land Cruiser’s corrosion warranty is 1 year longer than the Cullinan’s (5 vs. 4 years).

There are over 34 times as many Toyota dealers as there are Rolls-Royce dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Land Cruiser’s warranty.

Fuel Economy and Range

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Toyota Land Cruiser uses regular unleaded gasoline. The Cullinan requires premium for maximum efficiency, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.


For more complete vehicle control the Land Cruiser has a manually controlled automatic, with the available convenience of an automatic transmission and the complete gear control of a manual transmission without the inconvenience of a clutch. A manually controlled automatic allows the driver to eliminate unwanted shifts and maximize engine braking by down shifting while cornering. The Cullinan doesn’t offer a transmission that allows complete gear control.

Suspension and Handling

For better maneuverability, the Land Cruiser’s turning circle is 4.7 feet tighter than the Cullinan’s (38.7 feet vs. 43.4 feet).


The Toyota Land Cruiser may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 250 pounds less than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan.

The Land Cruiser is 1 foot, 3.4 inches shorter than the Cullinan, making the Land Cruiser easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

For excellent aerodynamics, the Land Cruiser has standard flush composite headlights. The Cullinan has recessed headlights that spoil its aerodynamic shape and create extra drag.

Passenger Space

The Land Cruiser has standard seating for 8 passengers; the Cullinan can only carry up to 5.

Cargo Capacity

The Land Cruiser’s cargo area provides more volume than the Cullinan.

Land Cruiser


Second Seat Folded

81.7 cubic feet

68.2 cubic feet

The Land Cruiser’s standard rear seats fold to accommodate long and bulky cargo. The Cullinan w/Executive Rear Seats doesn’t offer folding rear seats.


Consumer Reports® recommends the Toyota Land Cruiser, based on reliability, safety and performance.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos