2019 Toyota Avalon vs. 2019 Acura RLX

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash

Safety

Over 200 people are killed each year when backed over by motor vehicles. The Avalon Limited/Touring offers optional Rear Cross-Traffic Braking which use rear sensors to monitor and automatically apply the brakes to prevent a rear collision. The RLX doesn’t offer backup collision prevention brakes.

Both the Avalon and the RLX have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning and available around view monitors.

Warranty

Toyota pays for scheduled maintenance on the Avalon for 2 years and 25000 miles. Toyota will pay for oil changes, lubrication and any other required maintenance. Acura doesn’t pay scheduled maintenance for the RLX.

There are almost 5 times as many Toyota dealers as there are Acura dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Avalon’s warranty.

Reliability

A hardened steel chain, with no maintenance needs, drives the camshafts in the Avalon’s engine. A rubber belt that needs periodic replacement drives the RLX’s camshafts. If the RLX’s cam drive belt breaks the engine could be severely damaged when the pistons hit the opened valves.

To reliably start during all conditions and help handle large electrical loads, the Avalon has a standard 582-amp battery. The RLX’s 550-amp battery isn’t as powerful.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2018 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Toyota vehicles are better in initial quality than Acura vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Toyota 17th in initial quality. With 3 more problems per 100 vehicles, Acura is ranked 20th.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2018 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Acura vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Toyota 8th in reliability, above the industry average. With 32 more problems per 100 vehicles, Acura is ranked 20th.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ December 2018 Auto Issue reports that Toyota vehicles are more reliable than Acura vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Toyota second in reliability. Acura is ranked 13th.

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the Avalon gets better fuel mileage than the RLX FWD (21 city/31 hwy vs. 20 city/29 hwy). The Avalon XLE gets better fuel mileage than the RLX FWD (22 city/32 hwy vs. 20 city/29 hwy).

Suspension and Handling

The Avalon offers an available driver-adjustable suspension system. It allows the driver to choose between an extra-supple ride, reducing fatigue on long trips, or a sport setting, which allows maximum control for tricky roads. The RLX’s suspension doesn’t offer adjustable shock absorbers.

The Avalon Touring handles at .82 G’s, while the RLX pulls only .80 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The Avalon Touring executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the RLX (26.8 seconds @ .65 average G’s vs. 27.3 seconds @ .64 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Avalon XLE’s turning circle is 2.8 feet tighter than the RLX’s (37.7 feet vs. 40.5 feet). The Avalon Limited/Touring’s turning circle is 1.8 feet tighter than the RLX’s (38.7 feet vs. 40.5 feet).

Chassis

The Toyota Avalon may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 400 to 700 pounds less than the Acura RLX.

Passenger Space

The Avalon has 2.2 cubic feet more passenger volume than the RLX (104.3 vs. 102.1).

The Avalon has .9 inches more front headroom, 1 inch more rear headroom, 1.5 inches more rear legroom, .3 inches more rear hip room and .1 inches more rear shoulder room than the RLX.

Cargo Capacity

The Avalon has a much larger trunk than the RLX (16.1 vs. 14.9 cubic feet).

The Avalon’s standard rear seats fold to accommodate long and bulky cargo. The RLX doesn’t offer folding rear seats, only a ski pass-through.

Ergonomics

The power windows standard on both the Avalon and the RLX have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Avalon is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The RLX prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.

Economic Advantages

The Avalon will cost the buyer less in the long run because of its superior resale value. The IntelliChoice estimates that the Avalon will retain 47.15% to 48.78% of its original price after five years, while the RLX only retains 33.14% to 34.94%.

IntelliChoice estimates that five-year ownership costs (depreciation, financing, insurance, fuel, fees, repairs and maintenance) for the Toyota Avalon will be $25240 to $26996 less than for the Acura RLX.

Recommendations

The Toyota Avalon outsold the Acura RLX by almost 19 to one during the 2018 model year.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos