2019 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio vs. 2019 Mercedes AMG GLC 63

Detailed Review, Specifications & Comparison

Your buying experience includes...

business_centerProfessional Staff
account_balanceSimple Financing
local_gas_stationFull Tank of Gas
local_car_washFree Car Wash

2019 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio

Available Now!

Safety

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

When descending a steep, off-road slope, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s standard Hill Descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer Hill Descent Control.

To help make backing safer, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s cross-path warning system uses wide-angle radar in the rear bumper to alert the driver to vehicles approaching from the side, helping the driver avoid collisions. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer a cross-path warning system.

Both the Stelvio Quadrifoglio and the AMG GLC 63 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras and available lane departure warning systems.

Engine

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s 2.9 turbo V6 produces 36 more horsepower (505 vs. 469) than the AMG GLC 63’s 4.0 turbo V8.

As tested in Car and Driver the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio is faster than the Mercedes AMG GLC 63:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

AMG GLC 63

Zero to 60 MPH

3.3 sec

3.6 sec

Zero to 100 MPH

8.4 sec

8.9 sec

5 to 60 MPH Rolling Start

4.3 sec

4.4 sec

Passing 50 to 70 MPH

2.6 sec

3.1 sec

Quarter Mile

11.8 sec

12 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

117 MPH

115 MPH

Top Speed

176 MPH

157 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

On the EPA test cycle the Stelvio Quadrifoglio gets better fuel mileage than the AMG GLC 63:

MPG

Stevlio Quadrifoglio

AWD

2.9 Turbo 6 cyl.

17 city/23 hwy

AMG GLC 63

AWD

4.0 Turbo V8

16 city/22 hwy

An engine control system that can shut down half of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s fuel efficiency. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Brakes and Stopping

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio offers optional heat-treated ceramic brake rotors, which last ten to twenty times as long as conventional cast iron rotors, don’t rust, don’t fade during repeated high speed braking, and their lighter weight contribute to better braking, handling and acceleration. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer ceramic brake rotors.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio stops shorter than the AMG GLC 63:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

AMG GLC 63

70 to 0 MPH

155 feet

159 feet

Car and Driver

Suspension and Handling

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s front to rear weight distribution is more even (52.9% to 47.1%) than the AMG GLC 63’s (55.2% to 44.8%). This gives the Stelvio Quadrifoglio more stable handling and braking.

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio handles at .95 G’s, while the AMG GLC 63 pulls only .91 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

For greater off-road capability the Stelvio Quadrifoglio has a 1.8 inches greater minimum ground clearance than the AMG GLC 63 (7.9 vs. 6.1 inches), allowing the Stelvio Quadrifoglio to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged.

Chassis

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

As tested by Car and Driver while cruising at 70 MPH, the interior of the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is quieter than the AMG GLC 63 (66 vs. 71 dB).

Passenger Space

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has 2.4 inches more front headroom, .2 inches more front shoulder room and .4 inches more rear headroom than the AMG GLC 63.

Cargo Capacity

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has a larger cargo volume than the AMG GLC 63 with its rear seat up (18.5 vs. 17.6 cubic feet).

The Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s cargo area is larger than the AMG GLC 63’s in almost every dimension:

Stelvio Quadrifoglio

AMG GLC 63

Length to seat (2nd/1st)

39.4”/72.5”

36.6”/61.3”

Max Width

46.5”

n/a

Min Width

36.7”

43.3”

Height

28”

n/a

Ergonomics

© 1999 - 2019 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 45.55.47.189 2019/12/06

In poor weather, headlights can lose their effectiveness as grime builds up on their lenses. This can reduce visibility without the driver realizing. The Stelvio Quadrifoglio has standard headlight washers to keep headlight output high. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer headlight washers.

On extremely cold winter days, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio’s standard (except w/Sparco Racing Seats) heated steering wheel provides comfort, allowing the driver to steer safely and comfortably before the vehicle heater warms up. The AMG GLC 63 doesn’t offer a heated steering wheel.

© 1991-2018 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

How much is your car worth?

Get the best value for your car from an Asbury dealership.

Featured Videos